However, it pains me to note that, despite my pointing it out to the copy editor, there are a number of typos in the abstract -- the titles Braid (a video game) and Life A User's Manual (a novel) are not italicized, and a screw-up with spacing changed the phrase "This technique signals how ..." into the unintelligible "This technique signal show ..." There were even more such errors in the first proofs I was given, so at least some got fixed. Of course, the text file I sent them didn't have any errors in the first place ...
It's especially annoying because, thanks to Sage's (the academic publisher's) paywall, the abstract is the only publicly-accessible part of the paper, and it's the first indicator to researchers whether the article is worth reading. Not only that, but it's such an easy fix that I was able to correct the pdf version myself with Adobe Acrobat in about a minute.
So if anyone wants a corrected copy of the paper, let me know and I'll send it along just to spite 'em.